.
The most popular explanations of UFOs include theories that
they are technological artifacts from other planets, alien civilizations.
However, there are also people who believe that they might
be some secret technology developed and produced right here on earth.
There are some reasons to accept that theory, but much
stronger reasons to reject it.
The reasons to accept it include the fact that, indeed,
there are secret aircraft being produced and tested right here on earth. The stealth aircraft used by the United
States Air Force are no longer secret.
At least, their existence is well publicized. They are seen relatively often in the skies,
and have been deployed overseas in combat.
However, during the in-flight testing phases, such aircraft
were sometimes seen by members of the public, who reported them as Unidentified
Flying Objects (UFOs). Some people
speculated that they were from other planets.
Of course, they were wrong.
We can plausibly assume that there is more secret research
going on, well concealed, to test advanced technologies, including aircraft. Therefore, it seems possible that some of
these aircraft will on occasion be seen, and will be misidentified as alien
spacecraft.
However, the sightings of UFOs include reports of aircraft
performing high velocity changes in acceleration and / or in direction that no
human pilot could survive. Even if they
were unmanned drones, the performance of many UFOs exceeds anything that
earthly technology can produce. If an
earthly government could produce them, that government would be in possession
of technology with which they could rule the planet. The spin-off technology would be dramatically
advanced. The scientific principles they
evidence would be Nobel Prize developments.
In short, the long-term concealment of such things would seem
to be both impossible and counter-productive.
There is a hybrid theory.
Some people speculate that alien spacecraft have crashed on earth, and have
been recovered by the government. Such
wrecks, the rumor goes, have been taken to secret government laboratories and
studied. The studies have produced
limited results, but perhaps enough has been learned to enable the development
of primitive prototype aircraft that can perform a few of the aerial acrobatic feats
described by witness reports.
An even more dramatic speculation is that, not only have
alien space-craft come into the possession of our government, but also, even
nonhuman crewmembers of those space-craft.
Some say that crashed space-craft recoveries have rescued downed
space-men. Others propose that alien
space travelers did not crash, but are interacting with our government
voluntarily in some kind of diplomatic capacity.
All of the foregoing theories have problems with them, but
that is not to say that we in the general public can rule them out. We can, however, be very skeptical of them,
and with good reason. Governments can be
very good at keeping secrets for a long time; but if those secrets are valuable
and exploitable for advantage, those exploits eventually become evident, and
the secrets spill out.
Some people claim that there has been such spillage. They have attributed earthly advances in
science and technology to captured alien spacecraft; but none of those advances
violate known natural law, as many UFO sightings describe them.
Once again, without having access to government secrets, we
can only make estimations, but the evidence for the extraordinary claims of
copied alien technology is vague and unconvincing.
Ironically, the most extraordinary claim is the most
plausible, which is that the UFOs are spacecraft from alien civilizations on
faraway planets.
Even there, however, one encounters some paradoxes, such as,
why can we detect UFOs at all? If they
are so advanced, they should have foolproof stealth. Or, if they do not wish to hide, why can’t we
see them all over the place, all the time?
What makes the least sense is that they seem to try to hide, but get
seen anyway.
In the end, we are left with the unsatisfying theory that
UFOs are phenomena that we cannot begin to understand in terms of our present
paradigm.
That, however, seems to be the case.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment