UFO Secret is in Washington, D.C.
US Congressman Tim Burchett says something is going on, claiming that several people connected to UFOs, nuclear secrets, and advanced aerospace technology have died or gone missing, particularly around the time Trump discussed releasing UFO files.
Congressman Tim Burchett went on Newsmax and revealed that when he asked about what the president knows regarding UAP programs, an unelected official told him directly that the president of the United States is on a need-to-know basis.
U.S. Congressman Tim Burchett says that if the public knew what he knows about UAPs and aliens, the country would come unglued and “the world would be on fire.”
by Robert Arvay
Imagine an unelected, twenty-something-year-old bureaucrat, with a man-bun, wearing cargo shorts and a tee-shirt emblazoned with gutter-words, sitting in a chair in the Oval office. Imagine him, telling the President of the United States, in response to his question about UFOs/UAP, “I’ve decided that you don’t have a need to know that.”
That outrageous scenario may, in some form, actually be real. US Representative Tim Burchett (R-TN), in an online interview on Newsmax, stated that gatekeepers are illegally stonewalling Congress. Speaking as openly as possible, given the top-secret information he has been given, he (along with others in Congress) has seen proof that the space aliens are on Earth. The facts, he said, are so blood-chilling that, if and when the secrets are finally publicly revealed, paraphrasing, “You won’t be able to sleep at night.”
We are talking about secrets to which even Congress and the President have only limited, partial access, not by law, but at the whim of a super-secret cabal, hidden in the depths of a shadowy government that none of us elected. This is not a science-fiction thriller. A bipartisan congressional subcommittee has made repeated attempts to perform its Constitutional oversight responsibilities, to gain access to the information, and been thwarted at every turn by people who seem to somehow “own” the levers of power, and are accountable to no one.
Bone-chilling? Really? Recently, eight high-level officials, who apparently knew the secrets, have all mysteriously disappeared, been murdered, or otherwise died. We cannot conclusively explain what happened—but Burchett stated in the interview that he is not suicidal, nor does he engage in dangerous activities, so that if something bad happens to him, we should be skeptical of any official versions of the story of his untimely demise. What gave him a reason to say this?
Why is the secrecy so extreme? Why does the UFO/UAP phenomenon warrant this extraordinary level of safeguarding from the public, the President and Congress?
Certainly, it would be no big deal (or a very small deal) if the President were to address the nation, and say something like, “The UFOs are real. They are not of this Earth. We don’t know who they are, or why they are here. Their technology is vastly greater than ours. So far, they have not acted in a destructive manner toward us, but if they ever do, there is nothing we can do about it. So go about your normal lives, and make America great again.”
We could live with that. Many of us already assume that something like that is the case.
There might be a bit more concern if he said, “We have recovered crashed UFOs, and are studying them to see if we can usefully copy any of their technology. If we can, then perhaps we may benefit enormously, but so far, we have not done so. We have to keep these research efforts secret, because our enemies may also try to gain an advantage from the alien technology. We will keep the secrecy to a minimum, and we will keep the appropriate congressional oversight committees fully informed.”
If the President were to say such a thing, then the futures markets might go a bit crazy with the uncertain possibilities of dramatic new technologies soon to emerge. Will we have a cheap and endless source of energy? Aircraft that travel in minutes across the globe? Weapons that will protect us from any earthly enemy? Safe and abundant food supplies for everyone? Will no one be required to work anymore?
Is that the reason for the secrecy? Do we already have such technologies and fear to release them because of the economically catastrophic disruptions and displacements they would surely bring?
Somehow, that does not seem to be a sufficiently plausible explanation for the UFO secrecy.
Unfortunately, the actually plausible explanations all have sinister implications. Government agencies that illegally keep secrets, without oversight, and without accountability, generally can do whatever they please, for their own selfish, albeit institutional, reasons. We would like to think of those agencies in terms of the Manhattan Project, which acted responsibly and patriotically for the national good. We would also like to believe (sarcasm alert) in Santa Clause, but we would be fools to trust our future to such a belief.
There came a time when the Manhattan Project could no longer be kept secret. The nuclear bombs reached critical mass, exploded on target, and the world would never be the same again.
There is some evidence that the UFO secrets are becoming
ever more difficult to conceal. They are beginning to reach critical
mass. Will the world be changed forever?
-
-
Former US Intelligence officer reveals his take on the "Disclosure" documentary
https://www.facebook.com/reel/4482457938707052
He brings up a good point which I had never before noticed, which is that
the US Navy makes public its UFO data, while the Air Force does not.
Moreover, the Air Force has actually confiscated data from the Navy.
This is at least peculiar, and perhaps something worse.
-
-
After several years of reading and writing about the UFO phenomenon, I am finding that the subject matter is far more complicated than at first I had thought it would become. The topic has become so convoluted that, unless something dramatic develops to sort it all out, I may withdraw from further discussion.
The complication arises from the fact that there are many theories, of varying plausibility, that are being offered. They range from the evidence-based, scientifically founded, to the less plausible, and finally to fantastic speculations that are painful to mention.
Initially, the UFO theories seemed to center around supposed spacecraft in our skies. Later, there came theories of ancient lost civilizations on our planet. Now, the discussion has expanded to theories of so-called interdimensional creatures from other universes. More than that, commentators are talking about angels and demons, and something called cryptids, which include Bigfoot (Yeti). Paranormal subjects have also entered the discussion.
At some point, the subject matter must be enclosed by known science, but even the boundaries of science have widened so that people of ordinary intelligence are baffled by General Relativity and Quantum Physics. Recent observations by space-based telescopes are challenging longstanding concepts of the universe.
The human mind requires at least a minimal amount of certainty. While we may say that, “anything is possible,” we have to live our lives based on limits. When anything can happen, life becomes too chaotic to navigate.
So, unless I can find something important to say, I think I
will just make this my final post on the matter. I wish you all the best.
-
The UFO Paradox Has No Easy Solution
for American Thinker (11/30/2025)
by Robert Arvay
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Despite the many millions of taxpayer dollars being spent by the government, investigating UFOs (UAP), there are certain paradoxes concerning the phenomena, and it seems that there are more inconsistencies all the time. This is leading to chaos, confusion and further distrust of institutions. The government, to paraphrase President Reagan, is not the solution. It seems to be the problem.
The most noticeable paradox is that UFOs, with their supposed advanced technology, should have better stealth than do our supposedly, relatively primitive aircraft, such as the B-2 bomber—but they don’t. UFOs, if they wish not to be seen, should never be detected at all—or, if they do not care whether they are seen, should be observed very frequently, and under conditions conducive to accurate, detailed photography. Either one or the other of these should be likely, but neither of them is the case.
What is least likely, is the halfway measure, that is, they only sometimes get seen, but never under conditions that would provide convincing proof of their existence, such as for example as we have with photographs of eagles or hummingbirds. Instead, all we get are fuzzy, grainy pictures that never persuade reasonable skeptics.
It has long been stated by such skeptics that they would be persuaded of the existence of nonhuman advanced technology if they could see it firsthand, and analyze it, to show that it could not have been created with our present abilities. Proof would consist of actual specimens of such technology, or perhaps, actual specimens of alien creatures themselves, with demonstrably different biology than anything that could have evolved on earth.
To date, nothing of the sort has been presented for public examination.
What we have instead is sworn testimony by witnesses that they have seen, first hand, with their own eyes, advanced technology not of human origin—and even seen the aliens themselves. Despite their high degree of credibility, that is not enough. There is a disturbing gap, very slight, but one in which even they might have been deceived.
We are therefore presented with two extraordinary, opposing claims. One of them is that our government has in its possession, incontrovertible proof beyond doubt, that there are alien, other worldly spacecraft in our skies. The other claim is that numerous expert witnesses of high repute, are mistaken, deceived, or lying. We cannot decide between either of these claims without extraordinary evidence, and that evidence has not been presented to the satisfaction of the public.
How long can this continue?
Our elected representatives have held public hearings which always seem extraordinary but inconclusive. Those same representatives have also held “closed,” secret hearings, in which they say they have heard compelling testimony from eye witnesses, who offer strong evidence, perhaps extraordinary evidence, that our government has in its hands, undeniable proof of the sort which will convince even the hardest skeptics that we have been visited by intelligent creatures from another planet, or even another universe.
Some of the claims are beyond extraordinary, such as that our government is in close communication with alien creatures who are influencing our own technological innovations.
There is an old adage by book reviewers, in which the weakness of much science fiction is that, when anything can happen, no sense can be made of what does happen.
If the extraordinary claims are true, if there is indisputable evidence, we should either be given it, or else, be given a persuasive reason why it should be withheld.
Having neither, the next logical conclusion for many of us
is that our government is up to no good, and/or it is utterly incompetent, or even
worse. What that “even worse” could be
might be dreadful. I will leave that
territory to the writers of science fiction.
-
-
Videos
https://www.facebook.com/reel/4360197614199029
Former Pentagon official Chris Mellon warns that UFOs are real and tangible objects. The U.S. military is repeatedly encountering solid, intelligently controlled craft that enter restricted airspace, fly in formation, emit specific radio frequencies, disable nuclear weapons, jam fighter jet radars, and have caused injuries to military and civilian personnel.
-
-
-
