Friday, June 30, 2023

If It's UNBELIEVABLE, then maybe we should not BELIEVE IT

Marine Breaks 14-Year Silence on UFOs with Incredible Tale - Page Traveler

The site linked above has two videos.  The first one is spectacular but IMO doubtful. The second one is far from spectacular in its initially dull presentation, but after a time, it begins to potentially explain a large portion of the UFO Paradox.  As of this writing, I have not watched the entire video, because it is over 3 hours long, and I have the urge to say something in the meantime.

The main gist is that our government, and perhaps others, has retrieved crashed UFOs--interstellar extra-terrestrial spacecraft, along with dead aliens.

Moreover, we have somehow shot down some of these spacecraft.

Whoa.  That is way beyond belief, except that, once we begin to dig down, a lot of things do begin to make sense--IF--if we can believe the Air Force officer, and other highly placed people who speak in the video.

Now we get into the barely believable, except again, it explains a lot, if it is true.

At some point after World War Two, early 1950s, government entities became highly compartmentalized.  This means that small parts of the government kept secrets from the President and the Congress.  They do so to this day.  And they have become rogue agencies, escaping oversight and control by Congress.  They are, therefore, illegal, unconstitutional, and dangerous.  Subversive, even.

One of the secrets they keep involves UFOs.

Okay, SOMEHOW, at least one of those small offices discovered something about UFOs, namely, that they sometimes crash.  And more somehow, they were able to recover artefacts that are clearly made by intelligent beings not of this earth.

That is the part that makes me skeptical.  How could all of this have happened, AND been kept secret?

Okay, let's hypothesize that it happened.  If it did, then some super-secret agencies have partially mastered the alien technology of UFOs.  Therefore, they have manufactured mock-ups that evade our normal ability to detect them.  Our military is not in on the secret.

Getting more unbelievable is the report that some aliens have negotiated with our super-secret agencies.  That report says that the aliens are not hostile to us.  Very well, but why have they not been more public in their contacts?  That part of the UFO Paradox remains enigmatic.

This is all I will write for now.  I'll watch more of the video.  I remain open-minded, but highly skeptical for now.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = =

I finished watching the three-hour video, which includes within it the first video.

I remain skeptical, but puzzled.  There seems always just enough evidence to offer a degree of credibility to the claims, but at the same time, enough discrepancy to make one reject the overall story.

The overall story is that there is a "shadow government" that has in its possession crashed UFOs and other artefacts made by an "off-world" technology.  Furthermore, this shadow government has corpses of aliens that crew the UFOs.  Not only that, but the shadow government has contact with aliens.  These contacts are in the nature of emissaries.

Let's start with the more believable elements of the story, and proceed in steps to the less believable, even the unbelievable.

The existence of secret government agencies is entirely credible.  These agencies keep secrets, even from each other.  The 9/11/2001 atrocity might have been prevented had the CIA and FBI been permitted to share information.  Even when they are permitted, there are internecine power struggles as members of each agency seek to increase their power.  Knowledge is power, and keeping secrets gives one an advantage over competing power-seekers.  It's a tangled web that government weaves.

Next, we look at the evidence for physical artefacts made by advanced technology not of this earth.  That evidence is weak, so far as concerns the public, and Congress and the Administrative branch of government.  They seem not to have hard evidence in their possession.  However, what little evidence there is has not yet been adequately explained.  Many hundreds of credible reports, including expert eye-witness accounts, corroborated by radar detections, and especially the released reports of the USS Nimitz, USS Princeton and USS Roosevelt encounters are strong evidence that SOMETHING is in our skies.  Either something is very wrong with our surveillance capabilities, AND with our pilots' observational skills, or else, they really did detect something of an extraordinary nature--extraordinary but unexplained.

Finally, we get to the part of the story that is not only difficult to believe, but which has gaping holes in it.  The idea that a shadow government can capture, develop and fly UFOs, or good imitations of them, and keep this secret for decades, seems preposterous.  Yes, government did develop nuclear weapons in 1945, and kept them secret until they were used.  Hundreds of people were involved, and as far as we know, there were no substantial leaks.

However, eventually, two enemy spies (the Rosenbergs) did reveal the secrets to Russia, and were put to death for doing so.  Secrets of that magnitude do not remain secret forever.

The accounts of large numbers of military-equipped men moving in quickly, removing evidence of crashed UFOs, and taking them to secret locations where the artefacts are studied--all of this over decades with no substantial leaks--seems implausible at best.  That is the stuff of James Bond movies.

Perhaps the greatest mystery is, why are so many, otherwise credible, people making such claims?  Are they simply mistaken?  Have they been deceived?  Are they delusional?  Are they trying to make money from such claims?  Why do they risk their reputations and careers in this manner?

According to the video linked above, matters are reaching a breaking point, and the truth will soon be made known to the public.  That truth may be disappointing to the "true believers," and the UFO cultists.  If there is a bit more evidence, we may find confirmation of a very small grain of the overall story, perhaps an artefact or two of an ancient visitation, but nothing that would create a paradigm shift.

If there really are exo-civilizations--a very reasonable hypothesis indeed--then it is highly likely that at some point, we will have proof of that, with or without actual contact--after which, our entire culture might enter a new phase of history.

For now, caution and reason are the best course.

-

-

Friday, June 23, 2023

Senator Says Government is Not Forthcoming About UFOs

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said this week that the U.S. government has "downplayed, if not kept from the public," reports about unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP).

Hawley's comments came shortly after U.S. Air Force officer and former intelligence official David Grusch claimed that the government has found evidence of "non-human" wreckage that has been concealed from the public.

"The number of these is apparently huge," Hawley said on NewsNation. "And that is something that the government has, the best I can say about it, downplayed, if not kept from the public, for a long, long time."

Hawley said he can't "evaluate" Grusch's claims, but said that some details "sound plausible."

"I don't have any basis to evaluate them, but do some of the details that he's alleging, do they sound plausible? Yeah, sure. They sound plausible, based on what I've seen this government do in other instances," Hawley said.

Hawley later said Grusch is "saying that the government knows more about this than they have previously let on. That doesn't really surprise me. Because it looks to me like the government has been tracking these UAPs for a long time now, and has not been saying much about it."

Hawley also said: "What we learned from the Chinese spy balloon incident is that one part of the government actively concealed it from other parts of the government. Because that's what they do all the time."

Ancillary video is at

Sen. Hawley: Government 'Downplayed' UFO Reports | Newsmax.com

Saturday, June 10, 2023

IS OFFICIAL UFO DISINFORMATION DESIGNED TO TRAP US?

There are several anecdotes in UFO literature, dating back as far as the 1950s, which describe incidents in which reporters were told amazing stories of UFOs by government officials.  Whenever the reporter followed standard journalistic procedures, he would ask for corroboration--proof, if you will.  The tipster would then promise that proof would be presented the next day, but would also say, this is your chance to get the scoop, so publish it now.  Hurry.

The "proof" never came, and those reporters who fell for the trap were discredited.  Subsequent claims by qualified observers, such as pilots, radar operators and the like, could then be lumped in with the discredited reports, using the tactic of guilt by association.  The public would be deceived.

The tactic of disinformation is always a potential threat to any honest reporter. 

Some UFO news items seem clearly authentic, such as the famous USS Nimitz, Roosevelt and Princeton reports, with video tapes of fighter-pilot and shipboard radar recordings.  The US Navy eventually stated that the recordings are legitimate.

However, the Navy never verified the interpretations of those videos.  Indeed, some experts stated that there were explanations that do not involve any actual, extraordinary objects.  The software involved with the recordings seemed to have been fairly new at the time, and as any software expert can tell you, brand new software can have glitches.  The implication, and sometimes explicit claim, is that software and/or hardware malfunctions are the best explanation for the Nimitz (etc.) UFOs.

Those claims do not, of course, explain the "eyeball" sightings that several pilots, in several instances, have reported, sometimes at risk to their careers.  Those reports add credibility to the alien UFO interpretation.

By far the most spectacular, recent UFO news story (published here on AT) involves a claim, as yet unverified, that the US has in its possession, certain manufactured materials, recovered from UFO crashes or landings, that cannot have been made by humans.  If this claim proves to be true, then it involves the most significant, paradigm-shifting event in human history:  contact with an off-world, nonhuman civilization.

There is, of course, ample reason for serious skepticism about the claim of off-world materials.  Is this another case of deliberate deception?  Is it yet another trap?

The UFO/UAP phenomenon has many inconsistencies and even paradoxes.  One of them is that UFOs seem to attempt to avoid detection, yet despite their astoundingly advanced technology, get detected anyway--if indeed those detections are authentic.  Our own stealth aircraft, primitive as they are, are stealthier than the supposed aliens.

If the UFOs are not seeking to avoid detection, then verified sightings, proof, should be as commonplace as sightings of meteors, or more so.  They are not.  Thus, we have an unexplained paradox.

It seems that left-leaning news outlets are not reporting about UFOs as they did until recently.  Some have suggested that the government is seeking to trap conservative reporters and commentators, to destroy their credibility, advising the others to steer clear.  

The saying made famous by the fictional X-Files TV show is that, "The truth is out there."  Indeed it is, but so are deceivers, and in great numbers.

-


Friday, June 9, 2023

Police Spy Something Fall from Sky Moments Before 911 Call About 'Aliens' In Viral Video

I usually do not post items like this, but in this case, police witnessed an object fall from the sky, found the witnesses to be "normal" people, and local news made this report.  As to what really happened, I draw no conclusion at this time.

Click this link--video included:

Police Spy Something Fall from Sky Moments Before 911 Call About 'Aliens' (toofab.com)

Bodycam footage shows the object fall to Earth, before nervous police respond to a 911 call about 10-foot tall "alien" with "shiny eyes."

Thursday, June 8, 2023

Most Aliens May Be Artificial Intelligence, Not Life as We Know It

 Most Aliens May Be Artificial Intelligence, Not Life as We Know It - Scientific American

Human intelligence may be just a brief phase before machines take over. 

three things about the entities that SETI searches could reveal:

1.  They may not be organic or biological.

2. They may not remain on the surface of the planet where their biological precursors lived.

3. We may not be able to fathom their motives or intentions.

-

Tuesday, June 6, 2023

New whistleblower insists UFOs have landed here and the US government has them

 New whistleblower insists UFOs have landed here and the US government has them - American Thinker

An Air Force veteran and former member of the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency is coming forward with information on what he claims are extraterrestrial craft recovered and kept secret by the U.S. government.